I remember from my senior, between naps, in economics hearing about Microsoft's near-monopolistic ways in the 1990's. Microsoft started "integrating its Windows software with its Internet Explorer Web browser" (pg 55 under "Dividing up the Web) which made their web browser the most used by consumers, basically setting up a monopoly in the process. Now was it a monopoly? My 12th grade economics teacher said so, and he kind of scared me so I'm going to go with it was. Also Microsoft was hit with some serious fines and told to share "interoperability information with other software makers" (pg 56). I also recognized how much AOL has dwindled over the past decade. When my family switched from AOL to high speed internet it was awesome. No more having to wait for the page to load up, no more blocking the phone line, and especially no more of that awful noise the computer made whenever you wanted to go online. It did surprise me though that AOL still has the 4th largest amount of monthly visitors to their sites (chart on top of pg 56). Google's numbers did not surprise me at all. I just wonder how long it will take for somebody to challenge google in some way. It seems like google is growing more and more everyday. My phone even runs on a google based network. What's next? Banking? I'm of course being sarcastic but you get my point.
When I came across the section on internet security I started to think about what the government does and doesn't track. On page 60 under the government suveillance section it states the "USA PATRIOT Act...grants sweeping powers...to intercept individuals' online communications...intended to allow the government to more easily uncover and track potential terrorists and terrorist organizations". I mean they could be tracking anything and anybody. Is that right? I think so. I think that whatever they need to do to keep us all safe they should be able to do. There is always the question of what is appropriate for being online. I do agree that some things online are inappropriate for some or even most audiences. It seems to be getting a little ridiculous how easily inappropriate material can be accessed. For example, I know that both my brother and I have slipped up when trying to get to the Dick's Sporting Goods website and typed in dicks.com not even thinking about it. Now the only thing that shows up is an authorization page that asks you if you are of age, but still it seems just a little too easy. It's pretty scary when on the internet you can find such things as "bomb building instructions" (bottom of pg 62). It made me think that it would be better if some parts of the internet were government regulated or even just watched over by the government. However, one could argue the other way about where does it end? How much will the government take away? How much will be deemed inappropriate?
Some people say WWIII could be between Microsoft and Google. Great points and thoughtful insights. 10 points.
ReplyDelete